While we are all ski dreaming, I was inspired by this question on FBs "Ski the Northeast"
What’s your favorite unrealistic ski expansion that will never happen?
I was wondering what is the same answers some might have for the Mid Atlantic?
Some of the ones I can think of would be:
Which of those would you have wanted to see the most, or are there others that have been pitched over the years that you would have been excited to see no matter how unrealistic?
Buncher expansion (done right) would be the most useful to me since that's where I do most of my skiing...
But if we're going to pipe dream it, the most interesting to me would be cutting new slopes at Laurel and including downhill bike runs in that expansion and putting a brewery in the lodge and being open year round. <puts pipe down>
This perhaps isn't expansion dreams, but wish list:
* more snowmaking at Laurel for sure - great terrain sits unused much of the season!
* the slopes cut above the ol' tubing area at HV are already overgrown. They need to delete the tubing area, cut the slopes again, and throw in a triple down there. (I get that it's a long shot, but that is what should be done) - HV is crowded with beginners and large families. That's a good thing for the sport and in general, but expansion onto 31 would spread things out and allow intermediates to make use of the more challenging terrain that's already there on the edge.
* 7Springs - better grooming.
This would be great...but you're right, faces mostly south, and would be pretty steep...which wouldn't work for "return to basin" traffic. Unless they make it a blue "road" to connect with the skiers' right of Cupp run you (and others) have mentioned. The south facing might be a big hardship, but Snowshoe is pretty dang good at snowmaking, so maybe it could work! I thought the idea of a gondola connecting the two areas had been floated...guessing that would be more likely as a people mover...but I'd ski that new run. And Hawthorne has intrigued me for years.
The19thHole wrote:
Hawthorne at Snowshoe would be most obvious there, but also a run from the top of Silver Creek down to the bottom of Western Territory (yeah, some of this would probably be in the sun and they'd have to go over or under the road), followed by a lift from the bottom of the Western Territory back up to the top of Silver Creek. And a blue run to the skier's right of Cupp so people can utilize that way over to Silver Creek.
GGNagy wrote:
While we are all ski dreaming, I was inspired by this question on FBs "Ski the Northeast"
What’s your favorite unrealistic ski expansion that will never happen?
I was wondering what is the same answers some might have for the Mid Atlantic?
Some of the ones I can think of would be:
- Western Expansion at Seven Springs
- Bunchers slopes down to Rt 30
- Expansion of Blue Knob to skiers right of Stembogan
- "back side" of Whitetail
- Hawthorne slopes at Snowshoe
Which of those would you have wanted to see the most, or are there others that have been pitched over the years that you would have been excited to see no matter how unrealistic?
Even better would be TM buying back the land lookers right. Believe now owned by some sort of conservancy. Sold to finance lift repairs way back when. Some pretty good north facing terrain. And would link a new base to existing west-facing terrain.
And Mount Porte Crayon.
And Tory Mountain.
And Moonshine Mountain.
Pipe dreams all.
JohnL wrote:
And Mount Porte Crayon.
Be still my heart. That would be some of the most epic East Coast terrain and snowfall.
JohnL wrote:
GGNagy wrote:
While we are all ski dreaming, I was inspired by this question on FBs "Ski the Northeast"
What’s your favorite unrealistic ski expansion that will never happen?
I was wondering what is the same answers some might have for the Mid Atlantic?
Some of the ones I can think of would be:
- Western Expansion at Seven Springs
- Bunchers slopes down to Rt 30
- Expansion of Blue Knob to skiers right of Stembogan
- "back side" of Whitetail
- Hawthorne slopes at Snowshoe
Which of those would you have wanted to see the most, or are there others that have been pitched over the years that you would have been excited to see no matter how unrealistic?
And Mount Porte Crayon.
Oh dear... There's an old topic you are going to stir up again. :)
Since the topic kind of "grew" from how I envisioned it, I have two answers. The original one and the "grown" one
Outside of the change of hands, I think the installation of a lift (and snowmaking) was the only thing holding off the buncher expansion at HV. There was just a little bit more in elevation, but would have had a better sustained pitch compared to the rest of that area. It also would have been an advertisement with being visible from Rt 31.
Beyond all the snowmaking others have mentioned, Laurel Mt would benefit with a return to the original bottom of TimberTop. Don't wipe out LH for a lift to the top, but put a surface lift back to Midway or Deer Path. Put one more zig zag into Innsbrook to reach the bottom as well.
JMHO
needawax wrote:
This perhaps isn't expansion dreams, but wish list:
* more snowmaking at Laurel for sure - great terrain sits unused much of the season!
* the slopes cut above the ol' tubing area at HV are already overgrown. They need to delete the tubing area, cut the slopes again, and throw in a triple down there. (I get that it's a long shot, but that is what should be done) - HV is crowded with beginners and large families. That's a good thing for the sport and in general, but expansion onto 31 would spread things out and allow intermediates to make use of the more challenging terrain that's already there on the edge.
* 7Springs - better grooming.
I'd love to see the expansion at HV, but unfortunately, Vail said we'll never see it as they don't want to take traffic away from 7S. I think HV and Laurel for picked up because they had to take them, not that they really wanted them.
I'd like to see BK improve it's snowmaking system, update the lifts, increase night terrain, and redo that lodge. It's terrible.
I'd replace those two old doubles with a fixed grip quad at least. A detachable would be nice, but I don't see them putting that kind of money into it.