How's this for a backyard ski area - Mt. Baldy, CA
5 posts
3 users
2k+ views
Denis
February 4, 2010
Member since 07/12/2004 🔗
2,352 posts
I'm in Pasadena, CA where I attended a meeting for a couple days but also did some skiing. Pasadena is 40 min. from LA, considerably more in rush hr., but if you head east in the morning there is no traffic and you can be in the parking lot at Mt. Baldy in one hour flat. I did this on Wed. 2/3. You head east on I-210, exit on Mt. Baldy road, drive through a pretty suburban neighborhood and then Up - Up - Up. More than 4000 ft. to the 6000 ft level into a different world of snow and ice above the LA basin. I'd heard about it for years and once drove up for a look-see in summer. It's a box canyon with near vertical walls, reminiscent of Little Cottonwood. It's been there since the 1930s, almost forgotten: too steep for the average LA skier and too little snow. Some years they never open. When they have a big year people flock there. 2100 vertical feet, serious steeps, trees, 800 acres in bounds. http://www.mtbaldy.com/mountain-info.htm So far, this is a big year. It was great skiing. Spring conditions on south and east facing slopes and firm but chalky, very edgeable snow on (the steeper) north facing slopes. On big western mountains it is easy to get desensitized and deceived. But, if you stop and the snow rolls and sluffs past you for 30 - 60 seconds, you know it's steep.

This is just the beginning. The real name of the mountain is Mt. San Antonio and it tops out just under 9000 feet. The range is the San Gabriels, one of the most precipitous in the US. In winter the desert side is much colder than the Pacific side and holds snow to much lower elevation. There is a backcountry hut on that side built in the 1930s and operated by the Sierra Club,
http://angeles.sierraclub.org/lodges/sanantonioskihut.html
Staying and skiing there is a rite of passage for So Cal backcountry skiers. In a big year it is possible to ski a 6000 vertical foot descent to the floor of the Mojave Desert.

If this were on the east coast, no serious skier would go anywhere else, which would of course ruin it.
langleyskier
February 4, 2010
Member since 12/7/2004 🔗
824 posts
And the sad part is that Mt. Baldy is low on the totem pole as far as SOCAL resorts due to its lack of snowmaking/hig speeds/catering to snowbareders. I have been dying to go there some year though. Any pics?
langleyskier
February 4, 2010
Member since 12/7/2004 🔗
824 posts
oh and Mt. Baldy (otherwise known as San Antonio) is just over 10,000. The north slopes of the SoCal Mnts hold snow well into mid-late summer in the avalanche chutes.

Some REAL backcountry skiing there as well, along with the dangers. This is from 2 years ago after a large storm:
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iW_-xFMrxogkbR_IwmxpEEUzg3Aw

Mt High, just to the south, near Wrightwood is really fun to ski as well. Their East Resort has 1600 of high speed served terrain but not nearly as advanced as that at Baldy.

.... Definitely Jealous man
oldensign - DCSki Columnist
February 5, 2010
Member since 02/27/2007 🔗
512 posts
I too have been iching to ski here. There was a big write up in the last ski magazine about Mt Waterman which is also in this area. I skied MTN High a couple years ago and had a blast.

see my write up:

http://www.dcski.com/articles/view_article.php?article_id=1098&mode=headlines

I am moving to Ventura County next year and plan on being a regular at these places!
Denis
February 5, 2010
Member since 07/12/2004 🔗
2,352 posts
Thanks Robbie. I have read and enjoyed many of your stories, but I had missed that one.

I posted this thread to my VT friends and one of them sent me this hair curling story on skiing the San Antonio backcountry,
http://www.sierradescents.com/skiing/san-antonio/2006/girly-man-chute.php

Ski and Tell

Speak truth to powder.

Join the conversation by logging in.

Don't have an account? Create one here.

0.15 seconds