FS: Dynastar Legend 8000 (179) w/Look px12's
8 posts
5 users
2k+ views
chaga
March 10, 2010
Member since 11/24/2009 🔗
646 posts
Perfect condition. This is a one ski quiver...do your research...killer for spring skiing even out west, and best offer above $300 gets em.
JohnL - DCSki Supporter 
March 10, 2010
Member since 01/6/2000 🔗
3,565 posts
With normal bindings or those defective bindings that only attach in front? wink
chaga
March 11, 2010
Member since 11/24/2009 🔗
646 posts
ha, they wouldn't make a very good tele ski. they have Look PX12 alpine bindings on em.
SteveC
March 12, 2010
Member since 10/24/2005 🔗
145 posts
I got a pair (172's though, I think). love 'em. highly recommend. And for $300 + change, that's a good deal.
David
March 12, 2010
Member since 06/28/2004 🔗
2,444 posts
I'll give ya $35 plus shipping....
JohnL - DCSki Supporter 
March 13, 2010
Member since 01/6/2000 🔗
3,565 posts
Quote:
I'll give ya $35 plus shipping....


I'll give ya $36 plus shipping....

In all seriousness, excellent skis and bindings. *Great* skis for the Mid A, New England or out west. I already have a few skis that fit that part of my quiver, so I'm out.

If you haven't sold them by April, send out another post. I may be more reckless with my money.

JimK (and maybe Jimmy - length may be a bit long), these are some great skis for you guys...
jimmy
March 13, 2010
Member since 03/5/2004 🔗
2,650 posts
I've always wondered why more people don't ski these around here. This would have been a great year to have a pair.

Chaga other than the properly installed bindings, what don't you like about them?
chaga
March 16, 2010
Member since 11/24/2009 🔗
646 posts
Originally Posted By: jimmy
I've always wondered why more people don't ski these around here. This would have been a great year to have a pair.

Chaga other than the properly installed bindings, what don't you like about them?


nothin' besides the weird binders smile

Ski and Tell

Snowcat got your tongue?

Join the conversation by logging in.

Don't have an account? Create one here.

0.14 seconds